Dutch scientists; after a recently completed study, they have published interesting data that can be extremely useful for some and seriously upsetting for others. Researchers from the Faculty of Behavioral Sciences at the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands have come up with a simple method for detecting lies. Accordingly, all you need to do is pay attention to the “lack of detail”. Let’s look at the details together.

The scientific world has long been looking for an answer to the question of whether a person is lying or not.

Some previous research on the subject has listed some steps to take to determine when a person is lying. Accordingly, it has been stated that various methods should be used, such as carefully observing the facial expression and body language of the suspect, and focusing on cues in the person’s speech.

One of the scientific methods recommended to lie hunters is to find vulnerabilities by distracting the suspect.

However, a recently completed study shows that in order to determine when a person is lying, something else needs to be done.

According to Dutch scientists, the devil is in the details!

Because, according to a study by scientists from the Faculty of Behavioral Sciences at the University of Amsterdam, the easiest way to tell if a person is lying is to pay attention to the details, the details in that person’s speech.

According to Bruno Verschueret and colleagues, focusing on the level of detail of what a suspect is saying is the best way to find out if a suspect is lying.


Because, according to the research team, focusing on more than one thing to tell lies from the truth, such as simultaneously paying attention to both what the person is saying and body language, only makes it harder.

Verschuer said about this:This is absurd because it is actually an impossible task.he uses. In addition, the scientists say that incoming signals cannot be assessed in a short time.

As part of the study, two different groups were formed as “innocents and liars”.


Liars were asked to steal exam questions from a locker at the university and then lie about it. The only thing required of the innocent was to spend time on campus. A third group of subjects were then asked to investigate the theft of exam questions.

Innocents and liars interrogated by a third group of test subjects


Participants in the third group were expected to distinguish between liars and innocents. Investigators were free to evaluate the evidence they wanted in the first place. In other words, they could ask any question to the people in front of them so that they could tell the liars from the innocent. However, with this method, it was observed that the investigators’ predictions of who was lying were almost random.

In the second phase of the study, investigators were asked to reevaluate the testimony, focusing on details such as place, person, time, and location.


It was found that investigators who focused on specific details were better at distinguishing lies from the truth. In addition, it was noted that investigators who took into account all the evidence, achieved a success rate of 59 percent.

For those who focused on specific details, this increased to 66 percent. Of their findings, Verschuer said, “While those who tell the truth may give rich descriptions because they have personally experienced the event, the risk of being caught is increased even if the liars have made up the details.” used phrases.

Source: 1

Random Post